Sunday, April 20, 2008

oh no. am i really an analyst anymore?

the day before i sent my thesis to the committee, i had endeavored to erase the word "rank" from all but three pages of it [1].

evidently i missed a few spots.
so today i'm doing erasing and paraphrasing.

also, i feel like i'm violating some unspoken principles which many analysts share, as well as sabotaging any readership which my thesis (or the subsequent paper(s)) may ever claim.

i mean, words like "module" and "free module" [2] and "rank" and "generator" and "homomorphism" will scare the analysts away.

maybe it would help if i add a disclaimer such as 'no, really: it's like a vector space. honest!'

on the other hand, "measure" and "Lipschitz function" and "weak-star convergence" and "rectifiability" will scare the algebraists. i can live with that, actually.

so if one believes in a two-party system for mathematics, then i am done for. fortunately, i do not! q:



[1] to explain, one page is to explain why "rank" is not a good word to use, and two more pages to remind the reader later (in case they forget).

[2] as far as i know, "free module" appears on one page as a necessary evil.

No comments: