[written on friday]
maybe i should have waited until the end of today to submit the article. instead, i did so just before lunch. it took only 5 minutes to upload and fill out the form.
otherwise, today was wholly unproductive.
when i think about it, most of my workdays are unproductive, in the sense that no stunning breakthrough occurs. it's hard to say if i've ever had a moment that could really be called a "breakthrough."
i wouldn't call the process of research "continuous" either. maybe it's like a (1-D) distribution function from probability .. but, of course, that's being rather optimistic:
who says that there is always progress in research? [1]
as for particulars, today i felt uncommitted to any one idea or problem. my mind just started to wander and the rest of me was obliged to follow it.
i thought about curreηts,
then about metrιc spaces,
then returned to geοmetric measurε theοry;
all in all, in 5 pages i didn't prove anything .. maybe a lemma?
i wouldn't point to anything and call it a lemma, exactly. these were five pages of .. observations, i suppose: the lazy kind of maths, where you ..
no exploration of the unknown, no real struggle ..
.. and thus: nothing worthwhile earned.
[1] i've lost "theorems" before, due to sloppiness, which would make the graph decreasing on some sub-intervals.
maybe i should have waited until the end of today to submit the article. instead, i did so just before lunch. it took only 5 minutes to upload and fill out the form.
otherwise, today was wholly unproductive.
Stephanie: What did you do today?
Leonard: Well, I'm a physicist, so I just thought about stuff.
Stephanie: That's it?
Leonard: I wrote some of it down.
when i think about it, most of my workdays are unproductive, in the sense that no stunning breakthrough occurs. it's hard to say if i've ever had a moment that could really be called a "breakthrough."
i wouldn't call the process of research "continuous" either. maybe it's like a (1-D) distribution function from probability .. but, of course, that's being rather optimistic:
who says that there is always progress in research? [1]
as for particulars, today i felt uncommitted to any one idea or problem. my mind just started to wander and the rest of me was obliged to follow it.
i thought about curreηts,
then about metrιc spaces,
then returned to geοmetric measurε theοry;
all in all, in 5 pages i didn't prove anything .. maybe a lemma?
i wouldn't point to anything and call it a lemma, exactly. these were five pages of .. observations, i suppose: the lazy kind of maths, where you ..
- trace through proofs and examples that you already know,
- assume all the hypotheses you need to work through a special case,
- trying, all the while, to identify the driving mechanism behind it all.
no exploration of the unknown, no real struggle ..
.. and thus: nothing worthwhile earned.
[1] i've lost "theorems" before, due to sloppiness, which would make the graph decreasing on some sub-intervals.
No comments:
Post a Comment