i'm currently LaTeχing a revision of a manuscript, and now there are problems with terminology ..
i just realised that i'm using the term "net" in two different senses:
..
*frowns*
*sighs*
sometimes we mathematicians have to be more inventive with terminology ..!
i just realised that i'm using the term "net" in two different senses:
- from topology, a net is a generalisation of a sequence: the index set no longer consists of integers, but an arbitrary directed set but not necessarily a poset. (the usual example consists of subsets of a fixed set that are partially ordered by inclusion, but not necessarily totally so.)
- an ε-net (with ε positive), on the other hand, is a notion from metric geometry: roughly speaking, it is a locally finite approximation of a metric space.
in other words, i'm building a net from a net of nets!*grins*
..
*frowns*
*sighs*
sometimes we mathematicians have to be more inventive with terminology ..!
1 comment:
Not necessarily a poset?
Post a Comment